Figuring Out The LXD/LXC Command-line API
As a Linux user, I recently received a notice that my LXC container is unsupported. To learn the LXD/LXC command-line API, I discovered the command `lxc exec instance_name -- command` to execute commands in the LXD image, `lxc list` to view containers, `lxc start foo` to start one, and `lxc exec foo -- su --login ubuntu` to log.
Exploring the LXD/LXC Command-line API After My LXC Container Became Unsupported
By Michael Levin
Saturday, June 25, 2022
For my next trick, I have to get really comfortable with the lxc commands under lxd. Even that I know that’s my next trick has been quite a trick. The term “lxc” has two very different meanings, especially as older lxc technology is actively becoming deprecated and unsupported. I got a notice form my QEMU NAS hosting a sort of baby-Kubernetes that my lxc container is now unsupported and I need to upgrade it. However, the “lxc command” on the command-line under lxd is alive and well. And the one I now need to learn more urgently than any other is:
lxc exec <instance_name> -- <command>
This explains why there is a space BEFORE AND AFTER a double-minus. This is very rare in a Unix/Linux API. Double-minus signs are usually reserved for the long-version of a command-line argument, such as –help being the verbose alternative to -h and –editable being the verbose alternative to -e. It’s such a standard nix convention that seeing this really threw me off. Come on, Ubuntu! Find a better way. Oh, the damage is done. Okay, learn the API…
Okay, so I have an lxd image (no longer an lxc?) named “foo”. To execute commands (in general) inside the foo container, I do this:
lxc exec foo -- [command]
It is important beyond important to understand that the first double-minus is a delimiter to a command. Unix/Linux commands will very frequently carry an additional double-minus argument and so in order to read a login instruction correctly, we must read:
lxc exec foo -- su --login ubuntu
…as “With the lxc command that still controls things under the lxd Linux system daemon and is not really the old lxc deprecated tech even though it is named that way, execute against the image named “foo” the commands that follow this double-minus that must have a space between it and the command. In this case the command is “switch user” to the ubuntu user. I believe this means that the command is normally executing as “root”. I believe this is confirmed because if we didn’t want to switch users right away and actually wanted to be root, we would use this command:
lxc exec foo -- /bin/bash
That is the equivalent of saying all the above, but instead of immediately trying to switch user, we effectively just launch a bash shell with no command, which terminates at simply sitting in a bash shell as root.
…is a command-line parameter to switch user (su) and “ubuntu” is the value being fed in for that parameter. It can be thought of as a key/value pair with login as the key and ubuntu as the value. The parameter is –login and the argument is ubuntu. The language surrounding APIs is absolutely terrible.
But I think I got this.
9 times out of 10, I’m going to want to:
lxc list lxc start foo lxc exec foo -- su --login ubuntu
That will show me what containers I have and start one if it’s not started and log into it to do stuff there.
And now one of the profoundly important tests I need to do is whether the Linux container instances running under LXD under Windows subsystem for Linux (WSL2) do themselves run systemd, which is required for the sort of Linux system daemon experimental automation work I’m about to embark on:
…and they do! Woot! Success assured.