By Mike Levin

From AI Insights to Python Code: The Journey Begins

Okay so you’re gonna get some help analyzing your data, perhaps from Gemini in Google Sheets or CoPilot in Excel, and it will outright tell you something about your data. Maybe it will insert some charts and graphs, but maybe also it will give you the Python code it used to do the analysis.

Now you’re faced with a question. Do you just rely on the AI assistants forever to run that Python code and do your analysis? Or do you try to run it yourself?

And that’s the first place Pipulate can help people out there scratching this itch. Without even all the fancy Notebook-to-Web App conversion, Pipulate immediately gives you a local place to run your Python code that has unlimited local LLM help at no cost, with no API key or Cloud gotcha’s.

Let’s do some research!

---

The Cloud vs Local Dilemma: Exploring Our Options

This is me crafting the prompt. It’s not the research prompt itself yet. I actually want the AI to craft the prompt. I sort of flesh it out here in a precursor step.

Me: Okay, Gemini 2.5 Experimental. Here’s the situation. Write me a Deep Research prompt. We get AI help such as from Gemini built into Google Sheets and it gives us some insight about our data, and when we ask it to insert it into our sheet, it ends up being Python code.

Finding the Perfect Environment for Data Analysis

Me: We want to run that Python code against our data, experimentally. This looks like a job for Jupyter Notebooks. But we are very used to getting AI assistance now with our coding. And we also don’t want to incur cloud expenses or unintended gotcha’s of being lured and locked into paid services.

Crafting a Comprehensive Research Strategy

Me: So, articulate a prompt to research the pros and cons of Google Colab and it’s free and paid tiers. Look at the AI assistance you can get built into both Google Sheets with Gemini and Google Colab with Gemini. Don’t miss things like persistence of uploaded data and pip-installed components. The goal is having an easy peasy long-term place where we can conduct Pandas-oriented data investigations against our data.

The Local Alternative: Nix Flake and JupyterLab

Me: Our alternative platform is a Nix Flake that hosts a full JupyterLab environment with Jupyter AI and a local Ollama LLM with whatever model is most appropriate to help with Python programming, Pandas data analysis and running on local Macbook or Windows-laptop level hardware. The Nix Flake makes the Jupyter install fully deterministic on Mac, Windows or Linux, using virtualenv to create a local virtual environment for the freedom of pip installs even under nix.

The Final Research Challenge

Me: So the ask is to create a prompt to research the pros and cons of these two approaches to Notebooks for casual but ongoing data investigations like this for a relative newcomer to this sort of work. Also investigate other solutions, but only include the insofar as they provide a different set of pros and cons relative to local JupyterLab with Jupyter AI under Nix versus Google Colab.

---

Gemini 2.5 Experimental Drafts the Research Prompt

So the above was me just fleshing out what my research prompt should include, while this is the research prompt itself that I end up using. I’m going from Gemini 2.5 Experimental to Gemini Deep Research.

Gemini 2.5 Experimental: Okay, here is a draft for a Deep Research prompt designed to investigate the best notebook environment for your described scenario:

---

Deep Research Prompt: Comparing Notebook Environments for AI-Assisted Python Data Analysis

Context: We are evaluating environments for running Python data analysis code (primarily using Pandas), often generated initially by AI assistants like Gemini within Google Sheets. The target user is a relative newcomer to data analysis workflows but intends to perform these investigations casually yet on an ongoing, long-term basis. Key priorities include ease of use, effective AI coding assistance, cost predictability (preferring free or low-cost options with no hidden fees), data persistence, and environment stability/reproducibility.

Primary Options to Compare:

1. Google Colaboratory (Colab): A cloud-based Jupyter Notebook service provided by Google.
2. Local JupyterLab via Nix Flake: A local setup using a Nix Flake to define a deterministic JupyterLab environment, integrated with Jupyter AI connected to a locally running Ollama LLM (e.g., Code Llama, Mistral, etc., suitable for local hardware like a Macbook or Windows laptop). The Nix Flake includes virtualenv for flexible pip installs within the controlled environment.

Research Objectives:

1. Analyze Google Colab:
   • Pros & Cons: Detail the advantages and disadvantages of both the Free and Paid (Colab Pro/Pro+) tiers.
   • AI Integration: Evaluate the capabilities, usability, and limitations of the built-in Gemini AI assistance within Colab for Python/Pandas code generation, explanation, and debugging. Are there usage limits or costs associated with this AI?
   • Cost Structure: Clearly outline the costs associated with free and paid tiers. Are there potential hidden costs (e.g., exceeding compute limits, storage)? Are external API keys (e.g., for other Google Cloud services or external LLMs) required for enhanced functionality?
   • Persistence & Environment: Investigate the persistence of uploaded data files between sessions. How are pip-installed libraries handled? Do they persist, or do they need reinstallation? What are the storage limitations?
   • Ease of Use & Setup: Assess the setup process and day-to-day usability for a newcomer.
   • Gotchas & Lock-in: Identify potential downsides like session timeouts, resource limitations on the free tier, data privacy concerns (cloud-based), and potential difficulties in moving workflows away from Colab later.
2. Analyze Local JupyterLab via Nix Flake:
   • Pros & Cons: Detail the advantages (e.g., local control, privacy, reproducibility via Nix, offline capability, no direct cost for LLM use) and disadvantages (e.g., initial setup complexity of Nix, reliance on local hardware resources, managing local LLM).
   • AI Integration: Evaluate the setup and usability of Jupyter AI connected to a local Ollama LLM. How effective are locally runnable models (suitable for typical laptops) at providing Python/Pandas coding assistance compared to cloud-based models like Gemini?
   • Cost Structure: Primarily the cost of local hardware and electricity. Confirm no hidden subscription or API costs for the core local setup.
   • Persistence & Environment: Confirm that local data files are directly accessible and persistent. Explain how the Nix Flake + virtualenv combination ensures both a reproducible base environment and the flexibility for project-specific pip installs that persist locally.
   • Ease of Use & Setup: Assess the learning curve associated with setting up and using Nix/Nix Flakes compared to the benefits of deterministic environments across different OS (Mac, Windows via WSL2, Linux). How does the day-to-day JupyterLab experience compare?
   • Gotchas & Limitations: Identify potential challenges like managing the Ollama service, local hardware performance limitations impacting LLM responsiveness or analysis speed, and the initial Nix learning curve.
3. Comparative Analysis:
   • Directly compare Colab (specifically the free tier, with notes on paid benefits) and the local Nix/Jupyter/Ollama setup across all the above criteria (AI quality/cost, overall cost, persistence, ease of use vs. setup complexity, long-term suitability, privacy).
   • Highlight the fundamental trade-offs: Cloud convenience vs. Local control/privacy; potentially more powerful (but potentially costly/limited) cloud AI vs. Free but resource-constrained local AI; managed environment vs. user-managed environment.
   • Which approach better suits the goal of a long-term, easy-peasy place for casual but ongoing investigations for a newcomer?
4. Explore Distinct Alternatives:
   • Briefly research other potential solutions (e.g., VS Code with Jupyter & AI extensions, Anaconda distribution, other cloud notebook providers like Deepnote or Saturn Cloud).
   • Crucially, only elaborate on an alternative if it offers a significantly different set of pros and cons compared to the two primary options. For example, does VS Code offer a compelling middle ground? Does Anaconda simplify local setup significantly without Nix but lack its reproducibility? Focus on unique value propositions or trade-offs relevant to the user’s goals.

Final Output: Synthesize the findings into a clear comparison that directly addresses the user’s need for a sustainable, AI-assisted notebook environment for ongoing Pandas-based data exploration, enabling an informed decision between Google Colab and a local Nix/Jupyter/Ollama setup, while acknowledging any truly distinct alternatives.

---

Comparing Notebook Environments for AI-Assisted Python Data Analysis: A Guide for Beginners

The above was the prompt for Google Deep Research written from Gemini 2.5 Experimental given my criteria, while this is the final output produced by Gemini Deep Research.

1. Introduction: Embarking on Your Data Analysis Journey with the Right Tools

The ability to analyze data effectively has become an increasingly vital skill in today’s world, empowering individuals and organizations to extract meaningful patterns and make informed decisions. For those new to this field, the landscape of available tools can appear vast and sometimes overwhelming. Selecting the right environment for performing data analysis, especially when incorporating the assistance of artificial intelligence, is a crucial first step. This report aims to guide relative newcomers through a comparison of two prominent options for conducting Python-based data analysis: Google Colaboratory and a local JupyterLab setup enhanced with a Nix Flake for environment management and a locally run Ollama large language model (LLM) for AI coding assistance. The primary goal is to determine which environment best aligns with the needs of a user who intends to perform these investigations casually yet on an ongoing, long-term basis. Key priorities for such a user typically include ease of use, the effectiveness of AI coding assistance, cost predictability with a preference for free or low-cost options without hidden fees, reliable data persistence, and an environment that is both stable and reproducible for consistent results over time.

The nature of the user’s engagement, characterized as casual yet ongoing, suggests a critical need for a solution that balances initial simplicity with long-term sustainability. A tool that is easy to pick up and start using immediately will likely be favored, as the user may not dedicate extensive time to learning complex setups. However, the ongoing nature of the work necessitates an environment that remains reliable and does not frequently break or require significant effort for maintenance and reconfiguration. Therefore, this comparison will pay close attention to both the initial friction involved in setting up each environment and the long-term demands of using and maintaining them.

2. Google Colaboratory: A Beginner-Friendly Cloud Option

Google Colaboratory, often referred to as Colab, stands out as a widely adopted cloud-based Jupyter Notebook service provided by Google.1 It offers a unique advantage by allowing users to write and execute Python code directly in their web browsers without requiring any setup or installation on their local machines.2 This accessibility has made it a popular choice for students, educators, and professionals looking for a convenient platform to engage in data science and machine learning projects.

2.1. Pros & Cons of Free and Paid Tiers:

• Free Tier:
  • Pros:
    • The most significant benefit of Google Colab’s free tier is the readily available access to powerful computing resources, including Graphics Processing Units (GPUs) and Tensor Processing Units (TPUs).1 These accelerators can dramatically speed up computationally intensive data analysis tasks, particularly when dealing with large datasets or complex machine learning models, without the user needing to invest in expensive local hardware.2 This feature is particularly attractive to newcomers who might not possess high-end laptops equipped for such processing demands.
    • Colab’s accessibility through a standard web browser, without the need for any software installation, presents a very low barrier to entry.1 This immediate usability is a considerable advantage for individuals just starting their data analysis journey, as it allows them to bypass the often-daunting process of setting up a local development environment.
    • For beginners who are still learning about the essential tools for data analysis, Colab comes pre-installed with many of the most popular Python libraries, such as Pandas for data manipulation, NumPy for numerical computing, Matplotlib and Seaborn for data visualization.1 This pre-configuration saves users time and effort, as they can begin working with these libraries immediately without needing to handle installation themselves, which can sometimes involve navigating package dependencies and potential compatibility issues.
    • Integration with Google Drive provides seamless cloud-based storage and sharing of notebooks.1 Users can easily access their notebooks from any device with internet access, and collaboration becomes straightforward, mirroring the familiar process of sharing other Google Drive files like documents or spreadsheets. This ease of access and sharing can be particularly beneficial for beginners who might want to share their work for feedback or collaborate on projects.
  • Cons:
    • The free tier of Colab operates with dynamic and fluctuating resource limits on CPU, GPU, and RAM.3 Access to more powerful GPUs is heavily restricted, and users might experience disconnections or limitations on usage based on Google’s current capacity and overall demand. This unpredictability in resource availability can disrupt workflows, especially for tasks that require significant computational power or run for extended periods. For beginners, understanding these changing limits might be challenging, potentially leading to confusion when code that previously ran without issue suddenly encounters resource constraints.
    • Colab prioritizes interactive computing, and as such, free tier runtimes are subject to termination due to prolonged inactivity, typically around 90 minutes.3 Additionally, runtimes can be terminated if the user’s notebook consumes an excessive amount of resources. This ephemeral nature of the free tier can result in the loss of unsaved work and the interruption of long-running data analyses, which might be frustrating for beginners who are not yet accustomed to frequent saving or managing session lifecycles.
    • In the free tier, the availability and type of computing resources, such as specific GPU models or access to high-memory virtual machines, are not guaranteed.3 The resources allocated to a free user can vary based on demand and Google’s infrastructure, which can lead to inconsistent performance. Beginners might observe that the same code executes at different speeds or with varying resource availability on different occasions, making it harder to establish a consistent workflow.
    • The terms of service for Google Colab’s free tier prohibit certain activities that are deemed unrelated to interactive computing, including file hosting, media serving, torrenting, and cryptocurrency mining.3 While these restrictions are unlikely to impact typical data analysis workflows, it is important for users to be aware of them to avoid potential account issues.
    • Free Colab users have access to virtual machines with a standard amount of system memory (RAM).7 This might become a limitation when working with very large datasets that require significant amounts of memory to process. Beginners might encounter “out of memory” errors with larger datasets and might not immediately understand that this is due to the limitations of the free tier’s memory allocation.
  • Paid Tiers (Pro, Pro+, Pay As You Go):
    • Google Colab offers several paid subscription options, including Colab Pro and Colab Pro+, as well as a Pay As You Go plan, all of which provide increased compute power and longer runtime limits compared to the free tier.3 These paid options are designed to address the limitations of the free tier, allowing users to tackle more demanding data analysis and machine learning tasks with greater reliability.
    • Subscribers to Colab’s paid plans generally receive priority access to computing resources, including faster and more powerful GPUs.3 This priority access can lead to significantly reduced execution times for computationally intensive code, improving overall productivity.
    • The paid versions of Colab also provide access to virtual machines with a high memory system profile.3 This increased memory capacity enables users to work with larger datasets that would otherwise exceed the memory limitations of the free tier.
    • Compared to the free tier, paid Colab subscriptions come with fewer restrictions on usage and access to certain features.3 For instance, some limitations on runtime durations or access to specific types of resources are relaxed for paying users.
    • A notable feature of Colab Pro+ is background execution.3 This allows notebooks to continue running for up to 24 hours, even if the user closes their browser, provided they have a positive compute unit balance. This is particularly useful for very long-running tasks like training complex machine learning models.
    • The primary drawback of the paid tiers is the cost involved.1 Colab Pro and Pro+ require a monthly subscription fee, while the Pay As You Go plan charges based on the compute units consumed. Users need to consider their budget and usage patterns to determine the most cost-effective option.
    • Under the subscription-based Pro and Pro+ plans, users receive a certain number of compute units per month, and any additional units can be purchased through the Pay As You Go option.9 These compute units, whether part of the monthly allocation or purchased separately, typically expire after 90 days if not used, requiring users to manage their usage effectively to avoid wasting their investment.
    • Even with paid plans, the specific types and availability of computing resources can still be dynamic and subject to change over time.3 While paid users generally receive priority, Google does not guarantee unlimited access to all resource types at all times.
    • Users on paid Colab plans, particularly those using the Pay As You Go option, should be aware of potential hidden costs, such as the auto-purchase of additional compute units if their balance drops below a certain level.27 If auto-recharge is enabled, and a long-running task depletes the user’s compute units, Colab might automatically buy more, leading to unexpected charges if not carefully monitored.
• 2.2. Gemini AI Integration:
  • Google Colab has integrated Gemini AI to provide users with intelligent coding assistance for Python and Pandas.3 This includes the ability to generate code snippets based on natural language descriptions, explain the functionality of existing code, and assist in debugging by suggesting fixes for errors. These capabilities can be particularly beneficial for beginners who are still developing their coding skills and understanding of data analysis techniques.
  • The Gemini AI features are seamlessly integrated within the Google Colab interface, often appearing as a side panel or offering inline suggestions as the user types.29 This direct integration makes it easy for beginners to access AI assistance without needing to install additional tools or navigate away from their notebook environment.
  • It is important to note that while Gemini AI can be a powerful tool, it is still an evolving technology and might occasionally generate code that is plausible but not entirely correct or optimal.28 Therefore, beginners should exercise caution and always review and validate the AI-generated code to ensure it meets their needs and doesn’t introduce errors into their analysis.
  • The availability and cost of Gemini AI integration within Colab can vary depending on the user’s Colab tier.24 While some basic AI features might be accessible in the free tier, more advanced capabilities or higher usage allowances might be exclusive to paid Colab subscriptions or require a separate subscription to Google’s AI services like Gemini for Google Cloud or Google One AI Premium.
  • Users should also be aware that there might be usage limits, such as quotas on the number of requests that can be made to Gemini AI within a specific time frame (e.g., per minute or per day).10 These limits are in place to manage resource utilization and ensure fair access for all users.
  • Finally, the availability of Gemini AI features within Google Colab might be restricted to certain geographic locales.3 Not all users in all regions might have access to these AI-powered capabilities.
• 2.3. Cost Structure:
  • Google Colaboratory offers a free tier that does not require any direct monetary payment.3 However, as discussed earlier, this free tier comes with limitations on computing resources, runtime, and storage.
  • For users who need more resources or longer runtimes, Colab provides paid options including Colab Pro, Colab Pro+, and a Pay As You Go plan.1 Colab Pro is typically priced at $9.99 per month and offers 100 compute units, while Colab Pro+ costs $49.99 per month and includes 500 compute units.9 The Pay As You Go plan allows users to purchase compute units as needed, with options like 100 units for $9.99 or 500 units for $49.99.9 These paid plans provide more predictable costs for users with consistent or higher computational needs.
  • It is important to be aware of potential hidden costs associated with the paid plans. For instance, if a user on a plan with compute units has the auto-recharge feature enabled and their compute unit balance drops too low, Colab might automatically purchase additional units, leading to unexpected charges.27 Users should monitor their compute unit usage to avoid this.
  • Depending on the desired level of AI functionality, especially if the integrated Gemini features are insufficient, users might need to utilize the full Gemini API. This would likely require obtaining an external API key from Google Cloud and could incur separate costs based on the usage of the Gemini API, as per Google’s pricing structure for its AI services.37
• 2.4. Persistence & Environment:
  • In Google Colab, any data files that are uploaded directly to the notebook environment are temporary and will be removed once the session ends.3 To ensure data persistence across different sessions, users must explicitly save their files to Google Drive or connect to other cloud storage services. This requires beginners to learn and adopt the practice of saving their work externally to avoid data loss.
  • Similarly, any Python libraries installed using the pip command within a Colab notebook are also session-specific and will need to be reinstalled each time a new session is started.3 While this ensures a clean environment for each session, it can be inconvenient for frequently used libraries. Workarounds exist, such as installing libraries to Google Drive or creating a virtual environment within Drive, but these require additional steps and understanding.
  • The free tier of Colab offers a limited amount of temporary disk space, typically ranging from 50 to 80 GB.4 For long-term storage, users will likely rely on their Google Drive account, which offers 15 GB of free storage.48 These storage limitations might become a constraint when working with very large datasets.
  • The underlying software environment in Colab is managed entirely by Google. This offers a generally stable and consistent experience, as Google handles the setup and maintenance of the operating system and pre-installed packages. However, it also means that users have limited control over the specific versions of software or the ability to make deep customizations to the environment.
• 2.5. Ease of Use & Setup:
  • Google Colab is renowned for its ease of use and requires virtually no setup.1 Users can simply navigate to the Colab website in their browser and start a new notebook or open an existing one from Google Drive. This instant accessibility is a significant advantage for beginners who want to dive into data analysis without dealing with installation complexities.
  • Colab utilizes the familiar Jupyter Notebook interface, which is widely recognized for its user-friendly layout that combines code cells with markdown for explanations and visualizations.1 This intuitive interface makes it easier for newcomers to write and execute code, view results, and document their analysis process.
  • The Colab interface includes helpful features for beginners, such as a collection of pre-written code snippets for common tasks and the ability to create interactive forms from code variables.55 These features can simplify certain workflows and make it easier for those new to programming to perform data analysis tasks.
• 2.6. Gotchas & Lock-in:
  • One potential drawback of using Colab is the possibility of session timeouts, which can interrupt long-running computations if the notebook is idle or exceeds resource limits.3 Beginners might find these interruptions frustrating, especially if they are working with large datasets or complex analyses that take a significant amount of time to complete.
  • As mentioned earlier, the resource limitations of the free tier can sometimes be hit unexpectedly.3 This can lead to code failing to run or sessions being terminated, which might be confusing for new users who are not yet familiar with managing computational resources.
  • Given that Colab is a cloud-based service and notebooks are typically stored in Google Drive, users who are concerned about the privacy of their data might be hesitant to use Colab, especially if they are working with sensitive or confidential information.44 While Google provides security measures, some users might prefer the assurance of keeping their data and analysis on their local machine.
  • Workflows developed within Google Colab often become tightly integrated with the Google ecosystem, particularly Google Drive for storage.64 This reliance on Google’s services might make it more challenging to move these workflows to a completely different platform in the future, potentially leading to a degree of vendor lock-in.

3. Local JupyterLab via Nix Flake: Empowering Local Control and Privacy

Setting up JupyterLab on a local machine offers an alternative approach that provides greater control over the computing environment and ensures data privacy. This can be further enhanced by using a Nix Flake to manage the environment and integrating Jupyter AI with a locally run Ollama LLM for AI assistance.

3.1. Pros & Cons:

• Pros:
  • A local JupyterLab setup gives the user complete authority over every aspect of the computing environment.74 This includes the operating system configuration, the specific versions of Python and all installed libraries, and the ability to customize the environment to precisely match project requirements.
  • For users handling sensitive data, a significant advantage of a local setup is the enhanced data privacy.63 All data remains on the user’s local machine, and all computations are performed locally, eliminating concerns about uploading data to the cloud or potential security vulnerabilities associated with remote servers.
  • Utilizing a Nix Flake for environment management ensures a high degree of reproducibility.74 A Nix Flake is a declarative specification of the entire development environment, including the exact versions of all dependencies. This means the environment can be reliably recreated on different machines or at different times, guaranteeing consistent results and eliminating the “works on my machine” problem. This consistency can be particularly beneficial for beginners as it helps avoid environment-related errors that can be difficult to diagnose.
  • Once the necessary language models are downloaded for Ollama, a local JupyterLab setup can function entirely offline.74 This is advantageous for users who might work in environments with limited or no internet connectivity.
  • After the initial investment in hardware and the time spent on setup, there are no direct recurring costs associated with using local LLMs via Ollama.74 The user avoids subscription fees or per-usage charges for accessing AI assistance.
• Cons:
  • Setting up a local JupyterLab environment using Nix and Nix Flakes can be significantly more complex than using Google Colab.74 Nix has a unique approach to package management and requires learning a new set of concepts and commands, which can present a steep learning curve for beginners.
  • The performance of a local JupyterLab setup, especially when using Ollama for AI assistance, is directly dependent on the resources available on the user’s local hardware, including the CPU, RAM, and disk space.74 Running large language models locally can be computationally intensive, and users with less powerful laptops might experience slower performance or limitations on the size and complexity of the models they can use.
  • Managing the Ollama LLM service locally requires the user to handle tasks such as starting and stopping the Ollama server, downloading and updating language models, and potentially configuring server settings.74 This level of management might require some technical familiarity.
  • While Nix aims for reproducible builds, users might occasionally encounter challenges with package compatibility or need to build software from source if it’s not readily available in the Nixpkgs repository.88 This can sometimes require more advanced technical skills to resolve.
• 3.2. AI Integration:
  • Integrating AI into a local JupyterLab environment involves installing the Jupyter AI extension, which provides the interface for interacting with language models.74 This extension then needs to be configured to connect to a locally running Ollama LLM, which serves the desired language models (e.g., Code Llama, Mistral). This setup process requires some initial configuration steps within JupyterLab.
  • Once configured, users can interact with the local LLM through Jupyter AI using a chat interface that appears in the JupyterLab sidebar.87 They can type natural language prompts to ask for code generation, explanations, or assistance with debugging. Jupyter AI also provides “magic commands” that can be used directly within code cells to invoke AI functionalities.
  • The effectiveness of locally run LLMs for Python and Pandas coding assistance on typical laptop hardware can vary depending on several factors, including the specific LLM chosen (e.g., Code Llama, Mistral), its size and complexity, and the computational resources of the laptop.76 Smaller, quantized versions of models like Code Llama or Mistral might be more suitable for laptops with limited RAM or without a dedicated GPU, although they might not perform as well as larger models. Both Code Llama, which is specialized for code generation, and Mistral have demonstrated strong capabilities in understanding and generating code.113 However, compared to more powerful cloud-based models like Gemini, local LLMs might sometimes require more specific and detailed prompting to achieve the desired results.76
• 3.3. Cost Structure:
  • The primary costs associated with a local JupyterLab setup using Nix and Ollama are the initial investment in the local hardware, which in this scenario is assumed to be the user’s laptop (Macbook or Windows), and the ongoing cost of electricity to run the laptop.74 If the user’s current laptop lacks sufficient resources to run LLMs effectively, they might need to consider upgrading, which would involve a significant upfront expenditure. The electricity cost will depend on the laptop’s power consumption and the local electricity rates. The following table provides estimated annual electricity costs for a local server based on different average power consumptions and an assumed average electricity price of $0.15 per kilowatt-hour.

Scenario	Average Power Consumption (Watts)	Estimated Annual Cost (USD)
Light Use	50	65.70
Moderate Use & LLM	200	262.80
Heavy Use & Frequent LLM	500	657.00

These figures are estimates and can vary based on actual usage patterns and local electricity prices.

• 3.3. Cost Structure (continued):
  • Unlike cloud-based services, the core components of this local setup—JupyterLab, Nix, and Ollama—do not involve any direct subscription fees or API usage costs.[74] Once the software is installed, the user can utilize it without incurring recurring charges.
  • While the core setup is free of subscription costs, users might choose to purchase more powerful local hardware, such as a laptop with a dedicated GPU and more RAM, to improve the performance of running LLMs. This would be an optional, upfront cost.
  • It’s worth briefly mentioning that Ollama can also be run on cloud instances, which would involve costs based on the cloud provider’s pricing for virtual machines and storage.[126, 127, 140, 141] However, since the user’s query specifies a local setup, these cloud-based costs for Ollama are less directly relevant.
• 3.4. Persistence & Environment:
  • In a local JupyterLab setup, data files are directly accessed from and stored on the user’s local file system.74 This provides straightforward and reliable data persistence, as the files are saved directly to the user’s hard drive and are not tied to a temporary session.
  • The use of a Nix Flake is central to ensuring a deterministic base environment.74 The Flake precisely defines the operating system packages, their versions, and other dependencies required for the JupyterLab environment. This guarantees that the environment can be reproduced consistently across different operating systems (Mac, Windows via WSL2, Linux) and over time, addressing the user’s need for stability and reproducibility.
  • The Nix Flake can also include virtualenv, a tool for creating isolated Python environments.74 Within this controlled Nix environment, virtualenv allows for the flexible installation of Python libraries using pip for specific projects. These project-specific libraries are contained within the virtual environment and persist locally, providing a balance between the reproducibility offered by Nix and the flexibility needed for individual project dependencies.
• 3.5. Ease of Use & Setup:
  • While the daily use of JupyterLab in a local setup is generally similar to that of Colab, the initial setup and the learning curve associated with Nix and Nix Flakes can be quite steep for beginners.74 Understanding the fundamental concepts of Nix and the syntax of Flake configurations requires an investment of time and effort.
  • However, for users who intend to engage in data analysis on an ongoing basis, the long-term benefits of having a deterministic and reproducible environment managed by Nix can outweigh the initial complexity.74 The ability to precisely define and recreate the analysis environment can save significant time and effort in the long run by preventing issues arising from inconsistent software dependencies.
  • Once JupyterLab is successfully set up locally, the day-to-day experience of working with notebooks, writing and running code, and visualizing data is very similar to the experience in Google Colab.75 The user interface and the basic workflows remain largely the same, making the transition smoother after the initial setup phase.
  • For beginners who are interested in pursuing the local setup, there are various guides and tutorials available online that provide step-by-step instructions for setting up JupyterLab with Nix Flakes and integrating it with Ollama and Jupyter AI.86 While the process might require more technical engagement than simply opening a browser window, these resources can help ease the learning curve.
• 3.6. Gotchas & Limitations:
  • Managing the Ollama service locally might require some level of technical comfort with the command line for tasks such as starting and stopping the server and managing language models.74 Beginners who are not yet familiar with command-line interfaces might find this aspect challenging.
  • The responsiveness of the local LLM and the speed of data analysis will be constrained by the performance capabilities of the user’s laptop.74 Running large language models, in particular, can be resource-intensive, and users with older or less powerful laptops might experience slower response times or might be limited in the size of the models they can effectively use.
  • As mentioned previously, the initial learning curve for Nix can be a significant barrier for beginners.74 It requires understanding a new package management philosophy and learning to work with Nix configuration files.
  • When issues arise with a Nix Flake setup, troubleshooting them might require a deeper understanding of Nix concepts and potentially involve debugging Nix expressions, which could be challenging for those new to the system.82

4. Comparative Analysis: Cloud Convenience vs. Local Control

When comparing Google Colaboratory and the local Nix/Jupyter/Ollama setup, several key trade-offs emerge that directly relate to the user’s priorities.

In terms of AI quality and cost, Google Colab’s integrated Gemini AI has the potential to be more powerful, especially if the user opts for a paid tier or a separate Google AI subscription. However, these options come with associated costs and potential usage limits. The local setup, utilizing Ollama, offers free AI assistance after the initial setup, but its performance and the quality of the LLM’s output will be constrained by the user’s local hardware resources.

Regarding overall cost, Google Colab’s free tier is attractive as it involves no direct monetary outlay. However, users might find the limitations restrictive over time, potentially leading them to consider paid tiers. The local setup, on the other hand, primarily involves the cost of the user’s laptop and the electricity to run it. While there are no subscription fees for the core components, users might need to invest in hardware upgrades if their current laptop is insufficient for running LLMs smoothly.

Data persistence is handled differently in each environment. Colab requires users to explicitly save their data to Google Drive or another cloud storage solution to ensure it is retained across sessions. In contrast, a local JupyterLab setup inherently persists data directly on the user’s local file system, offering a more straightforward approach to data management.

The ease of use and setup complexity present a clear contrast between the two options. Google Colab excels in its simplicity, requiring no installation and offering immediate access through a web browser. This makes it highly appealing to beginners. The local setup, involving Nix and Ollama, has a significantly steeper initial learning curve and requires more technical engagement for setup.

Considering long-term suitability, Colab’s free tier might become restrictive as the user’s data analysis needs grow or if they require more consistent access to powerful computing resources. The local setup, while initially more complex, offers greater control and scalability within the limits of the user’s hardware.

Finally, in terms of privacy, the local Nix/Jupyter/Ollama setup provides a distinct advantage as all data and processing remain on the user’s local machine. Google Colab, being a cloud-based service, might raise privacy concerns for users working with sensitive information.

The fundamental trade-offs highlight the choice between cloud convenience and local control. Colab offers the ease of getting started and the potential for powerful cloud-based AI, but it comes with limitations and potential costs. The local setup provides greater control over the environment and ensures data privacy, but it requires a more significant initial investment in terms of learning and potentially hardware. The choice between a potentially more powerful but possibly costly and limited cloud AI and a free but resource-constrained local AI is another key consideration. Similarly, users must decide whether they prefer the managed environment of Colab or the user-managed environment of a local setup.

For a newcomer seeking a long-term, easy-peasy place for casual but ongoing investigations, Google Colab’s ease of use and immediate accessibility likely make it a more appealing option for getting started. The lack of initial setup and the pre-installed libraries allow beginners to start analyzing data quickly. However, for ongoing use, especially if the user becomes more involved in data analysis or if privacy is a significant concern, the local setup with Nix and Ollama offers a more robust and private long-term solution, provided the user is willing to invest the time and effort to learn the basics of Nix and manage the local environment.

5. Exploring Other Possibilities: Distinct Alternative Notebook Environments

While the primary focus of this report is on Google Colab and a local Nix/Jupyter/Ollama setup, several other notebook environments offer distinct sets of pros and cons that might be relevant to the user’s needs.

• 5.1. VS Code with Jupyter & AI Extensions: Visual Studio Code (VS Code) is a highly popular and versatile code editor that, with the installation of the appropriate extensions, can provide a powerful environment for Python data analysis.173 Compared to the basic JupyterLab interface, VS Code offers a more feature-rich Integrated Development Environment (IDE) with advanced code editing capabilities, debugging tools, and integrated Git support. To use VS Code for data analysis, users need to install it locally and set up their Python interpreter, which can be integrated with virtual environments or an Anaconda distribution.174 Notably, the Jupyter AI extension is also available for VS Code, allowing users to leverage AI-assisted coding within this IDE.87 This option presents a middle ground, offering a more powerful local development experience with the benefits of AI integration, although it requires initial installation and setup.
• 5.2. Anaconda Distribution: Anaconda is a widely used Python distribution that simplifies the process of setting up a local Python environment for data analysis.185 It comes bundled with a vast collection of pre-installed data science libraries, including Pandas, NumPy, and Matplotlib, as well as the Anaconda Navigator, a graphical user interface for managing environments and packages. Anaconda also includes Jupyter Notebook and JupyterLab.185 While Anaconda simplifies local Python setup and environment management using its conda package manager, it does not inherently provide the same level of deterministic environment control and reproducibility as Nix. However, for beginners who find the Nix learning curve too steep, Anaconda offers a significantly easier way to establish a local data analysis environment compared to manual Python installation.
• 5.3. Other Cloud Notebook Providers (Deepnote, Saturn Cloud): Besides Google Colab, several other cloud-based notebook providers exist, such as Deepnote and Saturn Cloud.197 These platforms often offer collaborative features, seamless integrations with various data sources, and sometimes more consistent resource allocation compared to the free tier of Colab. Many of these providers offer free tiers with certain limitations, as well as paid plans for more demanding users.199 The level of AI integration can vary among these platforms.197 If the limitations of Colab’s free tier become too restrictive, but the user prefers the convenience of a cloud-based solution over managing a local environment, exploring these alternative providers could be beneficial.

6. Conclusion and Recommendations: Choosing Your Ideal Data Analysis Companion

In summary, both Google Colaboratory and a local JupyterLab setup with Nix and Ollama offer distinct advantages and disadvantages for a beginner embarking on a journey of AI-assisted Python data analysis. Google Colab stands out for its exceptional ease of use, requiring no local installation and providing immediate access to a pre-configured environment with free computing resources and integrated AI assistance via Gemini. This makes it an excellent choice for newcomers to quickly get started and for occasional, less resource-intensive analyses. However, the free tier’s limitations on resources, runtime, and data persistence, along with potential privacy concerns and vendor lock-in, might become challenges for ongoing, long-term use. The paid tiers of Colab address some of these limitations but introduce costs.

On the other hand, a local JupyterLab setup with Nix and Ollama offers greater control over the environment, ensures data privacy, and provides a high degree of reproducibility for long-term projects. The ability to use locally run LLMs for AI assistance without recurring costs (after initial setup) is also a significant advantage. However, this approach comes with a steeper initial learning curve for setting up Nix and managing the local environment, and the performance is directly tied to the user’s local hardware capabilities.

For a newcomer seeking a long-term, easy-peasy solution for casual but ongoing investigations, the initial recommendation leans towards Google Colaboratory. Its ease of use and the immediate availability of resources and AI assistance make it the most accessible option for getting started. The user can begin analyzing data and experimenting with AI-generated code without the complexities of local setup. For ongoing use, especially as the user’s skills and needs evolve, they can explore the paid tiers of Colab for more resources and longer runtimes.

However, if the user is willing to invest the time and effort to learn the fundamentals of Nix and manage a local environment, a local JupyterLab setup with Nix and Ollama presents a more robust and private long-term solution. The reproducibility offered by Nix, the privacy of local data processing, and the freedom from recurring costs for AI assistance can be highly beneficial for sustained data analysis activities.

The alternative environments discussed, such as VS Code with Jupyter extensions, Anaconda, and other cloud notebook providers like Deepnote and Saturn Cloud, offer their own unique trade-offs. VS Code provides a more powerful local IDE, Anaconda simplifies Python environment management, and Deepnote and Saturn Cloud offer cloud-based alternatives with different features and pricing models. These might be considered as the user’s needs become more specific or if they encounter limitations with Colab.

Ultimately, the best environment will depend on the user’s individual comfort level with technology, their specific data analysis requirements, and their priorities regarding ease of use, cost, privacy, and long-term sustainability. It is encouraged to experiment with different options to find the one that best fits their workflow and supports their data analysis journey most effectively.

Works cited

1. Google Colab vs Jupyter Notebook: Key Differences Explained - TechRepublic, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.techrepublic.com/article/google-colab-vs-jupyter-notebook/
2. Google Colab Features, Best Practices Guide - Analytics Vidhya, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.analyticsvidhya.com/blog/2020/03/google-colab-machine-learning-deep-learning/
3. Google Colab, accessed April 4, 2025, https://research.google.com/colaboratory/faq.html
4. Frequently asked questions - Google Colab, accessed April 4, 2025, https://research.google.com/colaboratory/intl/en-GB/faq.html
5. Is there any limitations for google colab other than the session timeout after 12 hours?, accessed April 4, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/59783946/is-there-any-limitations-for-google-colab-other-than-the-session-timeout-after-1
6. Colab GPU free version limits? · openai whisper · Discussion #560 - GitHub, accessed April 4, 2025, https://github.com/openai/whisper/discussions/560
7. Making the Most of your Colab Subscription - Google, accessed April 4, 2025, https://colab.research.google.com/notebooks/pro.ipynb
8. Alternative to Colab Pro: Comparing Google’s Jupyter Notebooks to Gradient Notebooks (Updated!) - Paperspace Blog, accessed April 4, 2025, https://blog.paperspace.com/alternative-to-google-colab-pro/
9. Colab Paid Services Pricing - Google, accessed April 4, 2025, https://colab.research.google.com/signup
10. Quotas and limits | Colab Enterprise - Google Cloud, accessed April 4, 2025, https://cloud.google.com/colab/docs/quotas
11. Idle shutdown | Colab Enterprise - Google Cloud, accessed April 4, 2025, https://cloud.google.com/colab/docs/idle-shutdown
12. Google Colab session timeout - Stack Overflow, accessed April 4, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54057011/google-colab-session-timeout
13. Colab Tricks - Jimut Bahan Pal, accessed April 4, 2025, https://jimut123.github.io/blogs/ML/ColabTricks.html
14. runtime is less than 10 hours for colab pro + User · Issue #3451 · googlecolab/colabtools, accessed April 4, 2025, https://github.com/googlecolab/colabtools/issues/3451
15. So today I got colab pro and I have a question about the session runtime. Will the runtime disconnect if Im not active or the pc stay Idle? if yes is there any working script to prevent that? and as u see in the picture ive been training this model for about 4 hours and now I think I lost - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/GoogleColab/comments/1c4u9nd/so_today_i_got_colab_pro_and_i_have_a_question/
16. How can I prevent Google Colab from disconnecting? - Stack Overflow, accessed April 4, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/57113226/how-can-i-prevent-google-colab-from-disconnecting
17. How to avoid Google Colab Session Runtime from Closing with JavaScript? - YouTube, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5VkKlHuE4JQ
18. How to prevent Google Colab from disconnecting | A simple solution - YouTube, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=78rSqtkw3Gk
19. Anyone know how long is the timeout for hitting usage limits for Google Colab Pro? - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/deeplearning/comments/kvj3xm/anyone_know_how_long_is_the_timeout_for_hitting/
20. What is colab run-time limit : r/GoogleColab - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/GoogleColab/comments/t5j401/what_is_colab_runtime_limit/
21. How to Manage Usage Limits in Colab for Optimal Performance - Novita AI Blog, accessed April 4, 2025, https://blogs.novita.ai/how-to-manage-usage-limits-in-colab-for-optimal-performance/
22. Google Colab, RAM, VRAM and GPU usage limits – I – no clear conditions over multiple sessions | Linux-Blog, accessed April 4, 2025, https://linux-blog.anracom.com/2023/05/04/google-colab-ram-vram-and-gpu-usage-limits-i-no-clear-conditions-over-multiple-sessions/
23. colab.research.google.com, accessed April 4, 2025, https://colab.research.google.com/signup#:~:text=Colab%20Pro%2B%20offers%20background%20execution,dedicated%20VM%20at%20GCP%20Marketplace.
24. Introducing Colab Pro and Colab Pro+ for Google Workspace, accessed April 4, 2025, http://workspaceupdates.googleblog.com/2024/06/google-workspace-colab-pro-and-colab-pro-plus.html
25. Is Google CoLab Pro or CoLab Pro+ Worth it in 2023? - YouTube, accessed April 4, 2025, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ltnX0KDTfJQ\&pp=ygUHI2NvbGFiXw%3D%3D
26. Colab Pro+ Features, Kaggling on Colab, and Cloud GPU Platforms - head spin, accessed April 4, 2025, https://heads0rtai1s.github.io/2021/08/24/colab-plus-kaggle-cloud-gpu/
27. Google Colab A100 GPU cost? : r/GoogleColab - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/GoogleColab/comments/14x00yy/google_colab_a100_gpu_cost/
28. Gemini in Colab Enterprise - Google Cloud, accessed April 4, 2025, https://cloud.google.com/gemini/docs/colab/overview
29. Data Analysis and Visualization with Gemini and Google Colab, accessed April 4, 2025, https://technofile.substack.com/p/data-analysis-and-visualization-with
30. Write code in a Colab Enterprise notebook with Gemini assistance | Google Cloud, accessed April 4, 2025, https://cloud.google.com/colab/docs/use-code-completion
31. Python Data Analysis with Gemini AI & Google Colab - YouTube, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j4bhmlkpLfc
32. Data Science Agent in Colab: The future of data analysis with Gemini, accessed April 4, 2025, https://developers.googleblog.com/en/data-science-agent-in-colab-with-gemini/
33. Welcome To Colab - Colab - Google, accessed April 4, 2025, https://colab.research.google.com/
34. Google One AI Premium Plan and Features, accessed April 4, 2025, https://one.google.com/about/ai-premium/
35. Gemini for Google Cloud pricing, accessed April 4, 2025, https://cloud.google.com/products/gemini/pricing
36. Gemini Pricing: Everything You’ll Pay for Google Gemini - UC Today, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.uctoday.com/collaboration/gemini-pricing-everything-youll-pay-for-google-gemini/
37. Gemini Developer API Pricing | Gemini API | Google AI for Developers, accessed April 4, 2025, https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/pricing
38. Gemini Code Assist for business, accessed April 4, 2025, https://codeassist.google/products/business
39. Quotas and limits | Gemini for Google Cloud, accessed April 4, 2025, https://cloud.google.com/gemini/docs/quotas
40. Get started with the Gemini API: Python - Colab - Google, accessed April 4, 2025, https://colab.research.google.com/github/google/generative-ai-docs/blob/main/site/en/gemini-api/docs/get-started/python.ipynb
41. Rate limits | Gemini API | Google AI for Developers, accessed April 4, 2025, https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/rate-limits
42. Is Google CoLab Pro or CoLab Pro+ Worth it in 2023? - YouTube, accessed April 4, 2025, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=ltnX0KDTfJQ\&pp=ygUMI3lvbG9wcmVtaXVt
43. Colab GPUs Features & Pricing - Chris McCormick, accessed April 4, 2025, http://mccormickml.com/2024/04/23/colab-gpus-features-and-pricing/
44. Explained: 5 Drawback Of Google Colab For Machine Learners - Analytics India Magazine, accessed April 4, 2025, https://analyticsindiamag.com/ai-trends/explained-5-drawback-of-google-colab/
45. How to Persist Data in Google Colab Using JuiceFS, accessed April 4, 2025, https://juicefs.com/en/blog/usage-tips/colab-persist-data
46. Persisting data in Google Colaboratory - python - Stack Overflow, accessed April 4, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/47194063/persisting-data-in-google-colaboratory
47. Do I have to keep re-uploading my csv file every time I log in? : r/GoogleColab - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/GoogleColab/comments/1eo7vbm/do_i_have_to_keep_reuploading_my_csv_file_every/
48. Google Colab disk space vs Google Drive disk space - What’s the difference? - Brian H. Hough, accessed April 4, 2025, https://brianhhough.com/howto/google-colab-disk-space-vs-google-drive-disk-space-difference
49. Google Colab: Installation and Licensing - Gurobi Support, accessed April 4, 2025, https://support.gurobi.com/hc/en-us/articles/4409582394769-Google-Colab-Installation-and-Licensing
50. How do I install a library permanently in Colab? - Stack Overflow, accessed April 4, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55253498/how-do-i-install-a-library-permanently-in-colab
51. Persistent Dependencies : r/GoogleColab - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/GoogleColab/comments/1bvetv5/persistent_dependencies/
52. How to Install Libraries permanently in Google Colab? | by Netra Prasad Neupane | Medium, accessed April 4, 2025, https://netraneupane.medium.com/how-to-install-libraries-permanently-in-google-colab-fb15a585d8a5
53. Free cloud features and trial offer | Google Cloud Free Program, accessed April 4, 2025, https://cloud.google.com/free/docs/free-cloud-features
54. Feature Request: Colab Pro to increase storage as well. · Issue #990 · googlecolab/colabtools - GitHub, accessed April 4, 2025, https://github.com/googlecolab/colabtools/issues/990
55. 7 Advantages of Using Google Colab for Python | by Michael Van Den Reym, accessed April 4, 2025, https://python.plainenglish.io/7-advantages-of-using-google-colab-for-python-82ac5166fd4b
56. Google Colab - A Step-by-step Guide - AlgoTrading101 Blog, accessed April 4, 2025, https://algotrading101.com/learn/google-colab-guide/
57. Google Colab Tutorial for Beginners - YouTube, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rsBiVxzmhG0
58. Google Colab Tutorial for Beginners - YouTube, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLYoEyIHL6A
59. Getting Started with Google Colab: A Beginner’s Guide - Marqo, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.marqo.ai/blog/getting-started-with-google-colab-a-beginners-guide
60. A Beginner Friendly Walkthrough to Create Your First AI Application Using Google Colabs Features - Oxford Home Study Centre, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.oxfordhomestudy.com/OHSC-Blog/google-colab-ai-app
61. An Introduction to Colab and Jupyter for Beginners - Louis-François Bouchard, aka What’s AI, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.louisbouchard.ai/colab-vs-jupyter/
62. Google Colab Tutorial for Beginners - YouTube, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8KeJZBZGtYo\&pp=0gcJCdgAo7VqN5tD
63. Google Colab vs Jupyter Notebooks: A Guide to Data Enthusiasts - CodeInterview Blog, accessed April 4, 2025, https://codeinterview.io/blog/google-colab-vs-jupyter-notebooks-a-guide-to-data-enthusiasts/
64. Summarising 3 Years of Google Colab Usage — The Good, the Bad, and The Ugly | by Ori Abramovsky | Towards AI, accessed April 4, 2025, https://pub.towardsai.net/3-years-of-google-colab-usage-the-good-the-bad-and-the-ugly-e03ee4b7c92c
65. Massive Google Colaboratory Abuse: Gambling and Subscription Scam - Sucuri Blog, accessed April 4, 2025, https://blog.sucuri.net/2023/07/massive-google-colaboratory-abuse-gambling-and-subscription-scam.html
66. Is Google Colab notebook sharing my Drive data with the notebook author? - Stack Overflow, accessed April 4, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/51485287/is-google-colab-notebook-sharing-my-drive-data-with-the-notebook-author
67. Careful Who You Colab With:. abusing google colaboratory | by 4n7m4n - Medium, accessed April 4, 2025, https://antman1p-30185.medium.com/careful-who-you-colab-with-fa8001f933e7
68. Paranoid with a colab notebook and security questions. : r/GoogleColab - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/GoogleColab/comments/yo67nc/paranoid_with_a_colab_notebook_and_security/
69. Google Sheets Colab Extension/Add-On: Easily Import Data to Colab - YouTube, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7eVb0Wc3zrQ
70. Colaboratory + Drive + Github -> the workflow made simpler - Zero with Dot, accessed April 4, 2025, https://zerowithdot.com/colab-github-workflow/
71. How to move our model from Google Colab to Udacity’s Workspace (final lab project), accessed April 4, 2025, https://medium.com/@ml_kid/how-to-move-our-model-from-google-colab-to-udacitys-workspace-final-lab-project-88e1a0b7d6ab
72. [D] Efficient workflow with colab/jupyter? : r/MachineLearning - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/MachineLearning/comments/e8n9dm/d_efficient_workflow_with_colabjupyter/
73. A quick workflow for Google Colab, Github and Jupyter notebooks on Mac. - Medium, accessed April 4, 2025, https://medium.com/analytics-vidhya/a-quick-workflow-for-google-colab-github-and-jupyter-notebooks-on-mac-ff5d004e01f
74. Embracing AI-Assisted Development with Jupyter AI and Nix Flakes - Mike Levin, accessed April 4, 2025, https://mikelev.in/futureproof/jupyter-ai-nix-flake/
75. My First Nix Flake Will Be JupyterLab | Mike Levin on Linux, Python, vim & git (LPvg), accessed April 4, 2025, https://mikelev.in/futureproof/jupyter-nix-flake/
76. Local LLM AI with Pandas-AI - Restack, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.restack.io/p/pandas-ai-answer-local-llm-ai-cat-ai
77. Code Smarter, Not Harder: The Speed Benefits of LLMs in Data Science | AltaSigma, accessed April 4, 2025, https://altasigma.com/en/blog/llm-driven-coding
78. Ollama Cheatsheet - How to Run LLMs Locally with Ollama - Apidog, accessed April 4, 2025, https://apidog.com/blog/ollama-cheatsheet/
79. Cutting Off Skynet: Running Local LLMs With Ollama | by grepStrength - InfoSec Write-ups, accessed April 4, 2025, https://infosecwriteups.com/cutting-off-skynet-running-local-llms-with-ollama-8753e4d1426b
80. Running LLM Locally: A Beginner’s Guide to Using Ollama | by Arun Patidar | Medium, accessed April 4, 2025, https://medium.com/@arunpatidar26/run-llm-locally-ollama-8ea296747505
81. Flake my life - how do nix flakes work? - DEV Community, accessed April 4, 2025, https://dev.to/stablejoy/flake-my-life-how-do-nix-flakes-work-2foe
82. Flakes - NixOS Wiki, accessed April 4, 2025, https://nixos.wiki/wiki/Flakes
83. Advantages & Disadvantages of NixOS, accessed April 4, 2025, https://nixos-and-flakes.thiscute.world/introduction/advantages-and-disadvantages
84. A Tour of Nix Flakes - Mattia Gheda, accessed April 4, 2025, http://ghedam.at/a-tour-of-nix-flakes
85. Reproducible Shell environments via Nix Flakes - Software Factory, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.softwarefactory-project.io/reproducible-shell-environments-via-nix-flakes.html
86. Using Jupyter AI with Ollama Free Local LLMs : | by Kamelyoussef - Medium, accessed April 4, 2025, https://medium.com/@kamelyoussef1996/using-jupyter-ai-with-ollama-free-local-llms-d67f62b66fcc
87. Build Your Own AI Coding Assistant in JupyterLab with Ollama and Hugging Face, accessed April 4, 2025, https://towardsdatascience.com/build-your-own-ai-coding-assistant-in-jupyterlab-with-ollama-and-hugging-face/
88. What are some downsides of nix? : r/NixOS - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/NixOS/comments/1ej6xu9/what_are_some_downsides_of_nix/
89. Nix and NixOS: a retrospective | Brian McGee, accessed April 4, 2025, https://bmcgee.ie/posts/2023/01/nix-and-nixos-a-retrospective/
90. lambdanil/nix-problems: The many issues plaguing Nix - GitHub, accessed April 4, 2025, https://github.com/lambdanil/nix-problems
91. The Curse of NixOS - Wesley Aptekar-Cassels, accessed April 4, 2025, https://blog.wesleyac.com/posts/the-curse-of-nixos
92. Learning Nix language, tools and OS is too erratic : r/NixOS - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/NixOS/comments/ffssy1/learning_nix_language_tools_and_os_is_too_erratic/
93. The NixOS learning Curve - Richard’s Static Blog, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.main-vision.com/richard/blog/the-nixos-learning-curve/
94. I wish Nix had a shallower learning curve (or that I was smarter). It’s been on - Hacker News, accessed April 4, 2025, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39641563
95. Nix Flakes: first steps - Jakub Kozłowski, accessed April 4, 2025, https://blog.kubukoz.com/flakes-first-steps/
96. NixOS and Flakes Book: An unofficial book for beginners (free) | Hacker News, accessed April 4, 2025, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37818570
97. How to Run LLMs Locally with Ollama AI - GPU Mart, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.gpu-mart.com/blog/run-llms-with-ollama
98. Minimum system requirements · open-webui open-webui · Discussion #736 - GitHub, accessed April 4, 2025, https://github.com/open-webui/open-webui/discussions/736
99. Choosing the Right NVIDIA GPU for LLMs on the Ollama Platform - Database Mart, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.databasemart.com/blog/choosing-the-right-gpu-for-popluar-llms-on-ollama
100. Ollama Installation - Documentation & FAQ - HOSTKEY, accessed April 4, 2025, https://hostkey.com/documentation/technical/gpu/ollama/
101. What are the minimum hardware requirements to run an ollama model? - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ollama/comments/1gwbl0k/what_are_the_minimum_hardware_requirements_to_run/
102. Data Analytics: Hardware Specifications - Commvault Documentation, accessed April 4, 2025, https://documentation.commvault.com/11.20/data_analytics_hardware_specifications_01.html
103. From Zero to Hero - A Data Scientist’s Guide to Hardware - CFA UK, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.cfauk.org/pi-listing/from-zero-to-hero—a-data-scientists-guide-to-hardware
104. Hardware Recommendations for Data Science - Puget Systems, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.pugetsystems.com/solutions/ai-and-hpc-workstations/data-science/hardware-recommendations/
105. Urban Data Analytics: (2) Data storage and processing - Andy Hong, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.andyhong.org/single-post/urban-big-data-analytics-2
106. I Was Wrong about Nix | Hacker News, accessed April 4, 2025, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=22295102
107. Adding custom ipykernel on jupyterlab - Help - NixOS Discourse, accessed April 4, 2025, https://discourse.nixos.org/t/adding-custom-ipykernel-on-jupyterlab/42697
108. Flakes aren’t real and cannot hurt you: using Nix flakes the non-flake way | Hacker News, accessed April 4, 2025, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38929543
109. Ollama Jupyter Notebook Integration | Restackio, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.restack.io/p/ollama-answer-jupyter-notebook-cat-ai
110. How to Use Ollama LLM Model on Jupyter Notebook - YouTube, accessed April 4, 2025, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=T8emnz9uaf0
111. Ollama+Jupyter-AI+:llama3 How to Install Jupyter-AI with JupyterLabs & Connect with Ollama-Part 01 - YouTube, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7BbKmqH5gg
112. jupyterlab/jupyter-ai: A generative AI extension for JupyterLab - GitHub, accessed April 4, 2025, https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyter-ai
113. The Top LLMs For Code Generation: 2024 Edition - Scribble Data, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.scribbledata.io/blog/the-top-llms-for-code-generation-2024-edition/
114. What’s the point of local LLM for coding? : r/ChatGPTCoding - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPTCoding/comments/1j5dio7/whats_the_point_of_local_llm_for_coding/
115. Unleashing the Power of Local Language Models for Data Analysis:PandasAI with Llama3.2, accessed April 4, 2025, https://medium.com/@ashishsingh.chunar2017/unleashing-the-power-of-local-language-models-for-data-analysis-pandasai-with-llama3-2-df5a3e6c7119
116. Code Llama: Open Foundation Models for Code - arXiv, accessed April 4, 2025, https://arxiv.org/html/2308.12950v3
117. How good is code llama? A comprehensive performance analysis - BytePlus, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.byteplus.com/en/topic/504671
118. Code Llama Review: Performance & Features - BytePlus, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.byteplus.com/en/topic/414993
119. Code Llama: A concise summary. - by Mohini Kathrotiya - Medium, accessed April 4, 2025, https://medium.com/@mohinidiku99/code-llama-a-concise-summary-4659d9db8a6d
120. Fine-Tuning Improves the Performance of Meta’s Code Llama on SQL Code Generation, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.snowflake.com/en/blog/meta-code-llama-testing/
121. Mistral Medium - Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis, accessed April 4, 2025, https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/mistral-medium
122. Mistral 7B Instruct: Intelligence, Performance & Price Analysis, accessed April 4, 2025, https://artificialanalysis.ai/models/mistral-7b-instruct
123. Unleashing the Power of Mistral 7B: Step by Step Efficient Fine-Tuning for Medical QA Chatbot | by Arash Nicoomanesh | Medium, accessed April 4, 2025, https://medium.com/@anicomanesh/unleashing-the-power-of-mistral-7b-efficient-fine-tuning-for-medical-qa-fb3afaaa36e4
124. Mistral 7B: A Revolutionary Breakthrough in LLMs - Data Science Dojo, accessed April 4, 2025, https://datasciencedojo.com/blog/mistral-7b-emergence-in-llm/
125. A Comprehensive Guide to Working With the Mistral Large Model - DataCamp, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.datacamp.com/tutorial/guide-to-working-with-the-mistral-large-model
126. ollama cost of inference vs openai - GitHub Gist, accessed April 4, 2025, https://gist.github.com/jerzydziewierz/3b4a169c8d7cba89e18f613b32c3f52b
127. Your own ChatGPT for $0.04/hr - With Ollama, ChatUI & Salad - SaladCloud Blog, accessed April 4, 2025, https://blog.salad.com/ollama-deploy-chatgpt/
128. Sure, I can run some slow Llama3 models on my home network, but why bother whe… | Hacker News, accessed April 4, 2025, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40973849
129. Using Ollama to Build a Local Search Engine for Your Files | by Hemanth Gokavarapu, accessed April 4, 2025, https://medium.com/@hemanthgk/using-ollama-to-build-a-local-search-engine-for-your-files-d8a88f55cd51
130. I’m always curious about the power cost here. Everyone I’ve talked to who runs s… | Hacker News, accessed April 4, 2025, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=38018657
131. How to Drastically Reduce your Electricity Costs: Print Server vs. ezeep Hub, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.ezeep.com/electricity-costs-print-server-vs-ezeep-hub/
132. Cost to run a PC 24/7 per month to host a game server? | [H]ard - HardForum, accessed April 4, 2025, https://hardforum.com/threads/cost-to-run-a-pc-24-7-per-month-to-host-a-game-server.2031808/
133. Has anyone worked out how much it costs to keep their server on each day?, accessed April 4, 2025, https://forums.unraid.net/topic/122005-has-anyone-worked-out-how-much-it-costs-to-keep-their-server-on-each-day/
134. Cost of Efficiency : r/HomeServer - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/HomeServer/comments/17ju0t1/cost_of_efficiency/
135. What Are the Key Operating Costs of a Data Entry Business? – Businessplan-templates.com, accessed April 4, 2025, https://businessplan-templates.com/blogs/running-costs/data-entry-business
136. THE COST OF MAINTAINING PCS - Intel, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.intel.com/content/dam/www/public/apac/xa/en/asset/smbcentre/cost_of_maintaining_pcs.pdf
137. Costs of a Data Management System for Your Credit Union or Bank - GreenProfit Solutions, accessed April 4, 2025, https://greenprofitsolutions.com/blog/data-management-system-costs-credit-unions/
138. 2025 Computer Repair Prices List (with Free Estimates) // HomeGuide, accessed April 4, 2025, https://homeguide.com/costs/computer-repair-prices
139. Seeking Advice: Building a PC For Data Science Work : r/datascience - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/datascience/comments/gqhzwk/seeking_advice_building_a_pc_for_data_science_work/
140. Ollama - Plans and pricing | Elest.io, accessed April 4, 2025, https://elest.io/open-source/ollama/resources/plans-and-pricing
141. AWS Marketplace: Ollama with Open WebUI on Ubuntu 24.04, accessed April 4, 2025, https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-g36vovk7627cu
142. Working with Files — JupyterLab 4.4.0rc0 documentation, accessed April 4, 2025, https://jupyterlab.readthedocs.io/en/latest/user/files.html
143. Access your local file system from JupyterLab — jupyterlab-filesystem-access documentation, accessed April 4, 2025, https://jupyterlab-filesystem-access.readthedocs.io/
144. jupyterlab-filesystem-access, accessed April 4, 2025, https://jupyterlab-contrib.github.io/jupyterlab-filesystem-access.html
145. Local File System Usage — JupyterLab Demo - OpenComputingLab.github.io, accessed April 4, 2025, https://opencomputinglab.github.io/jupyterlab-demo/book/content/03_local_filesystem.html
146. How to open local file on Jupyter? - Stack Overflow, accessed April 4, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/46972225/how-to-open-local-file-on-jupyter
147. Can someone explain to me the advantage of using Nix over containers? What do th… | Hacker News, accessed April 4, 2025, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=33675310
148. Replacing `pip` In Python Nix Flake With `uv` | Mike Levin on Linux, Python, vim & git (LPvg), accessed April 4, 2025, https://mikelev.in/futureproof/python-nix-flake-uv/
149. isd/flake.nix at main · isd-project/isd - GitHub, accessed April 4, 2025, https://github.com/isd-project/isd/blob/main/flake.nix
150. How can I adjust the Nix Flake configuration for my virtual environment to ensure the successful execution of a Python script reliant on Ollama? - Stack Overflow, accessed April 4, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/78159761/how-can-i-adjust-the-nix-flake-configuration-for-my-virtual-environment-to-ensur
151. Optimizing Python Development: Virtualenv Kernels with Nix and Jupyter, accessed April 4, 2025, https://acalustra.com/optimizing-python-development-virtualenv-kernels-with-nix-and-jupyter.html
152. Does nix always create virtual environment deterministically - Stack Overflow, accessed April 4, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/76675795/does-nix-always-create-virtual-environment-deterministically
153. Devbox: A User-Friendly Approach to Reproducible Development Environments with Nix | by Bhagya Lakshmi | VAFION | Medium, accessed April 4, 2025, https://medium.com/vafion/devbox-a-user-friendly-approach-to-reproducible-development-environments-with-nix-83dbcd0ab8d8
154. Howto manage shareable, reproducible Nix environments via nix-shell - Software Factory, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.softwarefactory-project.io/howto-manage-shareable-reproducible-nix-environments-via-nix-shell.html
155. Build reproducible development environments with {rix} : r/rstats - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/rstats/comments/17dqyoh/build_reproducible_development_environments_with/
156. “NixOS is not reproducible” - Links, accessed April 4, 2025, https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nixos-is-not-reproducible/42688
157. How to record a reproducible profile in nix (especially from nix-env)? - Stack Overflow, accessed April 4, 2025, https://stackoverflow.com/questions/50242387/how-to-record-a-reproducible-profile-in-nix-especially-from-nix-env
158. JupyterLab vs Notebook: A Comprehensive Comparison - Kanaries Docs, accessed April 4, 2025, https://docs.kanaries.net/topics/Python/jupyterlab-vs-notebook
159. Why switch to Jupyterlab. Introduction - by Shaoni Mukherjee - Medium, accessed April 4, 2025, https://medium.com/@shaomukherjee/why-switch-to-jupyterlab-b7c154746579
160. Jupyter Notebooks for Data Analytics: A Beginner’s Guide – BMC Software | Blogs, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.bmc.com/blogs/installing-jupyter-for-big-data-and-analytics/
161. Show HN: A modern Jupyter client for macOS | Hacker News, accessed April 4, 2025, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40899242
162. Workstation Management With Nix Flakes: Jupyter Notebook Example - DEV Community, accessed April 4, 2025, https://dev.to/deciduously/workspace-management-with-nix-flakes-jupyter-notebook-example-2kke
163. Really bad first-time user experience · Issue #477 · jupyterlab/jupyterlab-desktop - GitHub, accessed April 4, 2025, https://github.com/jupyterlab/jupyterlab-desktop/issues/477
164. Getting started with Nix and Nix Flakes - DEV Community, accessed April 4, 2025, https://dev.to/arnu515/getting-started-with-nix-and-nix-flakes-mml
165. Jupyter and Python on NixOS - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/NixOS/comments/1aq58xv/jupyter_and_python_on_nixos/
166. miklevin/darwinix: Creating a Mac / Linux nix flake - GitHub, accessed April 4, 2025, https://github.com/miklevin/darwinix
167. Getting Started with Nix Flakes | Mike Levin on Linux, Python, vim & git (LPvg), accessed April 4, 2025, https://mikelev.in/futureproof/nix-flakes/
168. miklevin/pipulate: The Nix Flake JupyterLab environment for Pipulate - GitHub, accessed April 4, 2025, https://github.com/miklevin/pipulate
169. Managing Prompts Locally? : r/ollama - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/ollama/comments/1h2qdwo/managing_prompts_locally/
170. Flake not working with configuration : r/NixOS - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/NixOS/comments/1gaczg8/flake_not_working_with_configuration/
171. Problems with Flake.nix and modules path : r/NixOS - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/NixOS/comments/1bkgws9/problems_with_flakenix_and_modules_path/
172. Ssl error when trying to use nix flake command directly - Flox Community Forum, accessed April 4, 2025, https://discourse.flox.dev/t/ssl-error-when-trying-to-use-nix-flake-command-directly/682
173. PyCharm vs. Jupyter Notebook - The JetBrains Blog, accessed April 4, 2025, https://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/2024/09/pycharm-vs-jupyter-notebook/
174. Data Science in Visual Studio Code, accessed April 4, 2025, https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/datascience/overview
175. Python in Visual Studio Code, accessed April 4, 2025, https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/languages/python
176. How To Setup VS Code For Data Science — The Manual | by Meirav Ben Izhak - Medium, accessed April 4, 2025, https://medium.com/data-science/vs-code-setup-for-data-science-5f8ba549802a
177. VS Code Review: Features, Pros & Cons - BytePlus, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.byteplus.com/en/topic/408405
178. What is VS Code: an overview of the popular code editor and its features - Hostinger, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.hostinger.com/tutorials/what-is-vs-code
179. Visual Studio vs Visual Studio Code: What’s the Key Difference? - DistantJob, accessed April 4, 2025, https://distantjob.com/blog/visual-studio-vs-visual-studio-code/
180. Jupyter Notebook vs. VSCode: Which is Better for Data Science? | Saturn Cloud Blog, accessed April 4, 2025, https://saturncloud.io/blog/jupyter-notebook-vs-vscode-which-is-better-for-data-science/
181. Getting Started with Python in VS Code, accessed April 4, 2025, https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/python/python-tutorial
182. Jupyter - Visual Studio Marketplace, accessed April 4, 2025, https://marketplace.visualstudio.com/items?itemName=ms-toolsai.jupyter
183. Jupyter Notebooks in VS Code, accessed April 4, 2025, https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/datascience/jupyter-notebooks
184. Data Science in VS Code tutorial, accessed April 4, 2025, https://code.visualstudio.com/docs/datascience/data-science-tutorial
185. Anaconda for Python: Unleashing the Power of Python for Data Science - Snowflake, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.snowflake.com/guides/anaconda-python-unleashing-data-science/
186. Python for Data Analysis: When and How to Use It - Anaconda, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.anaconda.com/topics/python-for-data-analysis
187. Anaconda vs Python: Exploring Their Differences - DataCamp, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.datacamp.com/blog/anaconda-vs-python-key-differences
188. Introduction to Anaconda for Data Analysis | by Nova Novriansyah | Novai-Artificial Intelligence 101 | Medium, accessed April 4, 2025, https://medium.com/artificial-intelligence-101/introduction-to-anaconda-for-data-analysis-325d65bb7865
189. Managing environments - Anaconda, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.anaconda.com/docs/tools/anaconda-navigator/tutorials/manage-environments
190. Anaconda Environment Management - Python How Tos, accessed April 4, 2025, https://campbell-muscle-lab.github.io/howtos_Python/pages/anaconda/anaconda.html
191. Managing environments — conda 25.3.1.dev10 documentation, accessed April 4, 2025, https://docs.conda.io/docs/user-guide/tasks/manage-environments.html
192. Environments - Anaconda, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.anaconda.com/docs/psm/cloud/environments
193. Anaconda vs. Python Programming Languages: Explained with Differences - AmorServ, accessed April 4, 2025, https://amorserv.com/insights/anaconda-vs-python-programming-languages-explained-with-differences
194. Pros and Cons of Anaconda 2025 | PeerSpot, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.peerspot.com/products/anaconda-pros-and-cons
195. Anaconda Software Reviews, Pros and Cons, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.softwareadvice.com/machine-learning/anaconda-profile/reviews/
196. Anaconda Reviews - Pros & Cons, Ratings & more | GetApp 2025, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.getapp.com/emerging-technology-software/a/anaconda/reviews/
197. Deepnote: Analytics and data science notebook for teams., accessed April 4, 2025, https://deepnote.com/
198. Everything About Deepnote: Data Science Notebooks - SheCanCode, accessed April 4, 2025, https://shecancode.io/data-science-notebooks/
199. Deepnote | Data Science Notebooks, accessed April 4, 2025, https://datasciencenotebook.org/deepnote
200. Exploratory Data Analysis with Snowflake and Deepnote, accessed April 4, 2025, https://quickstarts.snowflake.com/guide/exploratory_data_analysis_with_snowflake_and_deepnote/
201. Data Science Platforms | Saturn Cloud, accessed April 4, 2025, https://saturncloud.io/platforms/data-science-platforms/
202. Data Analysis Platform - Saturn Cloud, accessed April 4, 2025, https://saturncloud.io/glossary/data-analysis-platform/
203. Saturn Cloud - AWS Marketplace, accessed April 4, 2025, https://aws.amazon.com/marketplace/pp/prodview-7tieobflxozfy
204. Machine Learning on Unstructured Data with Saturn Cloud and Snowflake, accessed April 4, 2025, https://quickstarts.snowflake.com/guide/machine_learning_with_saturncloud/index.html
205. Deepnote Software Review - Pros, Cons, and Features, accessed April 4, 2025, https://softwarefinder.com/analytics-software/deepnote-software/reviews
206. Anyone here using Hex or DeepNote? : r/datascience - Reddit, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/datascience/comments/zfhv6z/anyone_here_using_hex_or_deepnote/
207. Google Colab vs Deepnote: a side-by-side comparison for 2025, accessed April 4, 2025, https://deepnote.com/compare/colab-vs-deepnote
208. Deepnote AI vs. Jupyter AI: Which fits your data workflow better?, accessed April 4, 2025, https://deepnote.com/blog/deepnote-ai-vs-jupyter-ai-which-fits-your-data-workflow-better
209. Saturn Cloud Reviews & Ratings 2025 - TrustRadius, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.trustradius.com/products/saturn-cloud/reviews
210. Saturn Cloud Reviews - 2025 - Slashdot, accessed April 4, 2025, https://slashdot.org/software/p/Saturn-Cloud/
211. GitHub vs Saturn Cloud | TrustRadius, accessed April 4, 2025, https://www.trustradius.com/compare-products/github-vs-saturn-cloud
212. Saturn Cloud Reviews - Read Customer Reviews of Saturncloud.io, accessed April 4, 2025, https://saturn-cloud.tenereteam.com/

---

Initial Thoughts on Research Tools and Meta-Analysis

Okay, this is becoming an increasingly common pattern for me. I first flesh out what’s on my mind and articulate a prompt for research, then have one of the deep research tools go to town on it. Currently, I’m using Gemini for both parts, and in a completely meta twist, comparing tools that have Gemini built in against local LLM alternatives, haha!

Observations on Self-Referential Research Results (Cited Again!)

My own site, MikeLev.in, appears multiple times in the Works Cited section above and it’s interesting seeing my own .favicon scroll by during Gemini research, which by the way is incredible to watch. Whereas the other Deep Research AI tools out there are obviously using something like browser automation or one of those services like browser-use APIs, Google has already crawled and indexed it all and is looking at dozens of sites in a fraction of the time it takes ChatGPT Deep research to examine one site.

Evolving Focus: From Research to JupyterLab Implementation

I feel this is going to turn into instructions on how to do the JupyterLab local thing, since that’s what I really want to do and this research is sort of a form of framing the whole thing, and perhaps even providing validation and clear instructions on that path for others researching the same thing.

Considering Nix Flake Distribution Strategy

I provide a Nix Flake and clear instructions. Or do I? I think this may be a matter of making it more about an easily bottled-up and distributed Jupyter Notebook environment than it is about Pipulate. It’s like a step 1.

Understanding Pipulate’s Role in Workflow Processing

It goes something like this: Pipulate is a tool for turning Jupyter Notebooks into locally installed web apps that don’t expose the Python code, effectively turning it into a linear top-to-bottom workflow processor that mimics Notebook methodology without the complexity of exposed programming code. That can be said more eloquently, but that’s a start.

The Case for Local JupyterLab Installation

However, the process still often starts with mocking something up in a Jupyter Notebook, which is why a local version of JupyterLab (server) is installed side-by-side with Pipualte. This gives developers a place to get started that is free from any of the downsides they may encounter with Google Colab. Again, the language may need to be smoothed out, but it’s a start.

Evaluating Anaconda vs Nix Flake Approach

As the research indicated, there are multiple ways to get JupyterLab running locally including Anaconda, but this author believes that the shifting licensing of Anaconda is concerning, the amount of software it installs on your machine excessive, and the benefits versus a Nix Flake with a traditional Python virtual environment favors pip over conda questionable. Another research paper? Definitely wording refinement needed.

Demystifying the Nix Learning Curve

The state of the nix learning curve is different than what this research represents. The often repeated myth that gets hammered into LLM training is that Nix has a steep learning curve – and while that is true when you embrace NixOS as a full computing lifestyle change, it is not true when you’re using just the nix command as a package manager on macOS or Windows/WSL. Though I guess even the fact I have to put the “WSL” qualifier in there does increase the complexity for Windows folks.

Step-by-Step Installation Guide

Okay, I don’t want to get exhaustive here with the instructions, but it goes something like this. First you install the nix command on your system, preferably with the Determinate Systems Nix Installer because it’s better than the default installer – especially for macOS, allowing for a cleaner total uninstall if you ever want to, and better survival through macOS upgrades. On Windows, you first activate WSL and then run it from the Ubuntu Terminal.

Once Nix is on your machine, you run one more command from a Terminal where Nix is active. This may involve closing the terminal you installed it from and opening a new one. And even running this second command is optional as it’s probably better to just get a feel for what it’s doing:

• Cloning a repo from GitHub (or alternatively just downloading the .zip file for that repo)
• Unarchiving and cd’ing into that folder
• Typing: nix develop
• Following any additional instructions (tying: start in the case of Pipulate’s JupyterLab companion)
• Visiting localhost:8888 in your normal web browser

Comparing Setup Complexity with Google Colab

Yeah, I can see how this is way more intimidating of a start-up process than just using a Google Colab notebook. And it’s really only worth it if you get that permanent forever-forward kind of benefit that Nix offers. It’s perfect for doing a thing that you’re going to build on forever. This is the seed.

Addressing Update Challenges

Hmmm, I ditched the automated git-pulls every time you nix develop when I turned this project into the public-facing Pipulate from being Botifython. That presents a bit of an ongoing update challenge for the non-git-inclined out there. I will need to think about that. I will probably just start using git branching again, push my changes into main and then… and then… well, I guess the logical thing to do is have a Pipulate workflow that updates the system! Hahaha! Wow, don’t let that become a rabbit hole today.

Defining Core JupyterLab Implementation Goals

The point of today is to create that JupyterLab local AI-assisted playground next to Pipulate so that almost every project that comes up has an instant place to easily pull up that addresses the following:

• Client-oriented notebooks are in a separate repo, yet JupyterLab accessible
• Complete throw-away experimental scrapbook notebooks never get committed
• Work-in-progress notebooks of note are allowed to get committed as such
• Clean, finalized deliverable-making Notebooks get committed to repo and are promoted and marketed as such within the system
• Even then, there’s the flexibility to change filenames and organize directory structures over time
• A general absolute file-path convention is used throughout to deal with the VSCode/Cursor/Windsurf vs. JupyterLab os.getcwd() path problem

The Value Proposition for Local Python Development

This is a first-step in the “rest of your life” kind of blog post. The AIs can write and very often execute Python code in their very own sandbox. So can you! But unlike them locked into the ephemeral cloud infrastructure where everything has to meticulously clean up after itself or garbage fills the server, you can have your local data files persistent. That is, if you break your cloud-dependency for running Python code. And this is the one true path.

Understanding the Power of Interactive Notebooks

Why? Because it’s as friendly as we can make it for beginners while keeping everything you do operating-system independent, future-proof and accessible.

Notebooks have transformed the way we use Python, because it’s not a 1-time “run the program” – aka “pull the ripcord and pray” proposition. Instead, it’s a gradual run this, then run that, and sort of interactively build it up in the familiar web environment sort of proposition. There’s fancy words like REPL to describe this sort of interactive learning environment, but using them just complicates matters. If you set a = "Hello", a continues to be set to “Hello” until you deliberately reset it (“restart the kernel”). This makes all the difference to the beginner, and even advanced people working with data-sets, doing perhaps exploratory pre-pipeline work. It’s in this state where it’s not a workflow yet really, but you’re working things out. This kind of thing is big in finances and science. Oh, and SEO too.

Evaluating Google Colab’s Role and Limitations

Google Colab has done a wonderful job of making a location to run your Python easy in the cloud, but over time, there are downsides. To alleviate these downsides, you either start paying or find another way. This is that other way.

The Anaconda Consideration: Pros and Cons

Many roads at this point will lead you to something called Anacona which provides the conda package manager and a ginormous install that works well on native Macs and Windows, but at the price of kooky Mac-centric and Windows-centric code that will never port easily to the cloud again if you ever want to, and will hardly survive machine to machine upgrades or collaboration when paths or OSes change.

Also, the Anaconda licensing isn’t great, asking for money if you use it for commercial reasons. Anaconda is not Project Jupyter. Project Jupyter who brings you JupyterLab, the part you really want from Anaconda, are the true Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) people – just a project like GNU. Anaconda on the other hand is a business. Understandable, but the built-in Python pip package manager has matured a bit since the original Anaconda, which made conda necessary. So, new “pure” JuptyerLab install options now exist.

The Case for Nix as a Package Manager

Not only are the new install options pure in the sense of just JupyterLab without the rest of the Anaconda install coming with it, but you can solve the “it doesn’t work on my machine” problem with the nix package manager. What? You just mentioned the pip package manager for Python, you might say. Yes, nix is a package manager at the OS-level that can “get an app installed” on your Windows or Mac computer. That app in in this case is a very cloud-friendly version of Python (Linux-based), which itself has its own package manager, so you can freely pip install stuff in ad hoc data-science exploratory mode.

Next Steps and Future Considerations

Pshwew! Okay. I’m really going to have to distill this whole article down into that 1-paragraph elevator pitch value proposition that prefaces:

• Go run the Determinate Nix Installer using this one command
• Close and open your Terminal, and run this other command

There’s different ways to do that second command that pulls the app local with varying “software update” scenarios attached to them. I am tempted to bring back the “magic cookie” packaging technique that includes an .ssh key to do the git pull and update the repo underneath of them, but that’s a rabbit hole. Maybe. But not today. For today, I clean up this story and actually do it for myself so know the (non-magic-cookie) procedure for early adopters.

The Future of AI Code Assistance

Okay, we need to cover Jupyter AI and the code assistant IDEs. Jupyter AI is not Cursor with Claude. It will be disappointing versus the Cursor/Windsurf/Cline/Augment experience. Least we forget the Google IDX, Claude Desktop and the horde of competitors cropping up. This is because who helps you code and how is sort of like the new OS, and everyone wants to be the new Windows. And it will benefit you to embrace one that fits you best and bite the bullet and pay. I do with Cursor AI currently, but I’m keeping my mind open. Jupyter AI just provides a completely free local LLM coding assistant alternative (but for electricity).

I want to dig deeper here with more research, on the specifics of Jupyter AI, the VSCode forks like Cursor and Windsurf, and the plugins to VSCode like Cline and Augment, and then finally the completely alternative platforms out there both in the free and open source software arena and the proprietary stuff like Google IDX and Claude Desktop, but that’s going to be for another article!

---

Gemini 2.5 Experimental Weighs In

Okay, here’s the summary, title ideas, analysis, and opinion based on the article you provided:

Summary (Author’s First-Person Perspective)

[Moved to top of article]

Title and Headline Ideas

• Colab vs. Local Jupyter: Finding Your Forever Home for AI-Assisted Data Analysis
• Beyond Colab: Why a Local Nix + Jupyter Setup is the Future-Proof Choice
• Breaking Cloud Dependency: Setting Up a Private, AI-Powered Data Lab Locally
• Nix, Jupyter, and Local LLMs: Your Guide to a Sustainable Data Science Workflow
• Is Google Colab Holding You Back? Exploring Local, Reproducible Alternatives
• The Beginner’s Dilemma: Cloud Convenience (Colab) vs. Local Control (Nix/Jupyter)
• AI Coding Assistance: Comparing Cloud Gemini with Local Ollama in Jupyter
• From Colab User to Local Power User: A Journey with Nix and JupyterLab

Strengths and Weaknesses

Strengths:

• Detailed Comparison: The article provides an exhaustive comparison between Google Colab and a specific local setup (Nix/Jupyter/Ollama), backed by extensive research (evident from the “Works Cited”).
• Addresses Key User Needs: It focuses on crucial aspects for newcomers doing ongoing work: ease of use, AI assistance, cost, persistence, and reproducibility.
• First-Person Narrative: The author’s personal perspective and journey make the technical topic more engaging and relatable.
• Practical Considerations: It goes beyond theoretical comparison to discuss actual setup steps (Nix installation, commands) and acknowledges practical challenges (learning curve, updates).
• Acknowledges Alternatives: Briefly touches upon other solutions like VS Code and Anaconda, providing context.
• Forward-Looking: Discusses the importance of long-term sustainability and avoiding vendor lock-in.

Weaknesses:

• Length and Density: The article, especially the research section, is very long and dense, potentially overwhelming for the target “newcomer” audience.
• Potential Bias: The author clearly favors the local Nix setup, which might color the presentation despite the attempt at balanced research.
• Complexity of Nix: While arguing the learning curve is manageable, the explanation might still seem complex to absolute beginners. The need for WSL on Windows adds an extra layer.
• Scope Creep: The article drifts between a comparison, a tutorial/guide for the Nix setup, and commentary on the author’s related project (Pipulate).
• Rapidly Evolving Field: The specifics of AI assistants (Gemini, Ollama models, Jupyter AI) and platforms can change quickly, potentially dating parts of the analysis.
• Unresolved Update Mechanism: The author acknowledges needing a better update strategy for the Nix Flake setup for non-git users but doesn’t provide a solution.

AI Opinion

The article offers a valuable, albeit lengthy, deep dive into a relevant dilemma for data analysis practitioners: choosing between convenient cloud platforms like Google Colab and more controlled, private local environments. The author’s personal journey and advocacy for the Nix-based local setup provide a compelling narrative.

The strength lies in the thoroughness of the comparison, addressing practical concerns often overlooked in purely technical reviews. The inclusion of the detailed research prompt and the extensive bibliography adds credibility.

However, its length and the inherent complexity of the preferred Nix solution might make it challenging for the intended beginner audience. The author’s enthusiasm for Nix, while informative, could be perceived as biased. The piece could benefit from tighter editing to separate the core comparison from the specific setup guide and personal project promotion, perhaps breaking it into multiple, more focused articles.

Overall, it’s a comprehensive resource for someone seriously considering these two specific paths and willing to invest the time to understand the nuances, particularly if they share the author’s concerns about cloud dependency and prioritize long-term reproducibility and privacy.